[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments

Jon Wilson j85wilson at fastmail.fm
Sun Oct 19 14:50:16 EDT 2008


Yes, my apologies.  It was a thinko.

Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
> 
> On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Jon Wilson wrote:
> 
>> On the other hand, take a decreasing sequence
>> (< 4 3 2 1)
>> (< 3 2 1)
>> (< 3 2)
>> (< 2)
>> (<)
>> all => #f?
>> Is it less silly if, for example, whether a sequence is increasing could
>> be changed from #f to #t by removing the last element?
> 
> That's not silly at all.
> 
> Take (< 1 2 3 4 5 -1000) which is #f, remove the last element, and you 
> get #t.
> 
> Aziz,,,




More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list