[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments
Jon Wilson
j85wilson at fastmail.fm
Sun Oct 19 14:50:16 EDT 2008
Yes, my apologies. It was a thinko.
Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Jon Wilson wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, take a decreasing sequence
>> (< 4 3 2 1)
>> (< 3 2 1)
>> (< 3 2)
>> (< 2)
>> (<)
>> all => #f?
>> Is it less silly if, for example, whether a sequence is increasing could
>> be changed from #f to #t by removing the last element?
>
> That's not silly at all.
>
> Take (< 1 2 3 4 5 -1000) which is #f, remove the last element, and you
> get #t.
>
> Aziz,,,
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list