[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments
Abdulaziz Ghuloum
aghuloum at cs.indiana.edu
Sun Oct 19 16:57:53 EDT 2008
On Oct 19, 2008, at 4:38 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> That would, however, undermine the otherwise reliable deduction that
> when applied to the same arguments, < and => (and likewise > and <=)
> produce results of opposite truth value. The same is true of
> applying <
> or <= to the reversal of the arguments of > and >= respectively.
No, because there is no such "reliable deduction" to begin with.
(< x y) does not necessarily produce the same result as (not (>= x y))
Do you need an example?
Aziz,,,
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list