[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments

[Thomas Lord]

Thomas Lord wrote:
> Ken Dickey wrote:

D'oh.  Semantically massive typo but hopefully only briefly confusing.

I wrote:

>
> I like 2b.
>

And then went on to explain the reasons for what I meant to say which was

    I like 2a.

That is, you've persuaded me that the numeric relation predicates should
accept exactly two arguments - no more, no less.

-t

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/attachments/20081019/e2f24bbd/attachment.htm