[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments
Abdulaziz Ghuloum
aghuloum at cs.indiana.edu
Tue Oct 21 01:46:46 EDT 2008
On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:26 AM, Thomas Lord wrote:
> You spotted a mistake I made, sure, but you didn't say: "Oh,
> there's a mistake here. This does give an error, see? I recognize
> that doesn't change your main point but, gotcha on that one" you
> instead insinuated something mean about me.
I did none of that; I just pointed out the error you made.
I couldn't have said "that doesn't change your main point"
since, honestly, I don't know what your point was. I was
just pointing out the error, and asked if you'd tried your
code out. That's all. No mean nothing about you intended.
Aziz,,,
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list