[r6rs-discuss] Complex <?

[John Cowan]

Ken Dickey scripsit:

> The naive reading (for a non-English speaker) would be that +2i is somehow 
> less real than +inf.0 .  8^)

That's just what it is: less real -- in fact, not real at all.  Non-real
numbers aren't magnitudes, and < does not and should not accept them
as arguments.

-- 
An observable characteristic is not necessarily         John Cowan
a functional requirement.  --John Hudson                cowan at ccil.org