[r6rs-discuss] Essence and Quintessence: Naming the next Schemes

[John Cowan]

Pavel Dudrenov scripsit:

> Why change the name of scheme at all? Scheme is scheme, I can't even
> think of a more perfect name. It's seems like changing the name would
> just create more confusion then benefit. There is no need to have a
> "cool new version N name", scheme is a great name already.

It's problematic in the age of Google not to have a unique name, though
"scheme" does mostly find the language.

-- 
So they play that [tune] on                     John Cowan
their fascist banjos, eh?                       cowan at ccil.org
        --Great-Souled Sam                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan