[r6rs-discuss] Essence and Quintessence: Naming the next Schemes
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Aug 25 15:26:03 EDT 2009
Pavel Dudrenov scripsit:
> Why change the name of scheme at all? Scheme is scheme, I can't even
> think of a more perfect name. It's seems like changing the name would
> just create more confusion then benefit. There is no need to have a
> "cool new version N name", scheme is a great name already.
It's problematic in the age of Google not to have a unique name, though
"scheme" does mostly find the language.
So they play that [tune] on John Cowan
their fascist banjos, eh? cowan at ccil.org
--Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
More information about the r6rs-discuss