[r6rs-discuss] JAR statement

[Andreas Rottmann]

John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> writes:

> Brian Harvey scripsit:
>
>> Should there be one language for both?  No; there should be Common Lisp for
>> the industrial users and Scheme for the academic users.
>
> I'm closer to an industrial user (except not), but I don't wanna use Common
> Lisp.  I don't *like* Common Lisp.  I wanna use Scheme.
>
While I would qualify neither as an "industrial" user nor as an
academical one (as I'm using Scheme to hack free software in my spare
time), I also prefer Scheme over CL. Probably many non-academic users
feel the same way (preferring a Lisp-1 over a Lisp-2).

Rotty