[r6rs-discuss] JAR statement

Jonathan A Rees jar at mumble.net
Wed Feb 18 22:02:07 EST 2009


On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Brian Harvey wrote:

>> The pre-R6RS process achieved harmony
>> and quality by halting progress. The R6RS process  traded harmony for
>> progress. There has to be a third way.
>
> IMHO we should be wary of the word "progress."

Good point. I didn't mean to say that doing something is always  
better than doing nothing, or that progress in one direction is  
equivalent to progress in another.

Jonathan




More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list