[r6rs-discuss] Now, where were we?
Derick Eddington
derick.eddington at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 10:23:57 EST 2009
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 08:53 -0500, Sam TH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu>
> > the R6RS semantics of top-level
> > programs that import from libraries other than the
> > specific libraries described in the R6RS documents is
> > explicitly implementation-dependent. Many of us would
> > like to fix that
> and I also hope that
> the problems of specifying how to import libraries not defined in the
> R6RS is addressed.
I have an SRFI proposal which addresses this nearing completion. The
portable reference implementation is completed and tested. I just need
to finish writing the SRFI. I think I'll be submitting it soon.
--
: Derick
----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list