[r6rs-discuss] Now, where were we?

Derick Eddington derick.eddington at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 10:23:57 EST 2009


On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 08:53 -0500, Sam TH wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> 

> > the R6RS semantics of top-level
> > programs that import from libraries other than the
> > specific libraries described in the R6RS documents is
> > explicitly implementation-dependent.  Many of us would
> > like to fix that

> and I also hope that
> the problems of specifying how to import libraries not defined in the
> R6RS is addressed.

I have an SRFI proposal which addresses this nearing completion.  The
portable reference implementation is completed and tested.  I just need
to finish writing the SRFI.  I think I'll be submitting it soon.

-- 
: Derick
----------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list