[r6rs-discuss] string->number

John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
Wed Mar 25 01:18:16 EDT 2009


Vincent Manis scripsit:

> This raises an interesting point. Perhaps there are language standards
> that have no implementation-defined behavior. I have certainly never
> seen one.

ES 3.1 is attempting to reach the stage where there is no *explicitly*
undefined behavior.  The same is true of Java.  There may, of course,
be undefined behavior as a result of overlooked points.  For example,
it is not explicitly prescribed by ES 3.1 that evaluating arithmetic
expressions cannot have side effects.

-- 
Values of beeta will give rise to dom!          John Cowan
(5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
to rename '.' or '..' entries; see              cowan at ccil.org
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/odd.html)



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list