[r6rs-discuss] string->number
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Wed Mar 25 01:18:16 EDT 2009
Vincent Manis scripsit:
> This raises an interesting point. Perhaps there are language standards
> that have no implementation-defined behavior. I have certainly never
> seen one.
ES 3.1 is attempting to reach the stage where there is no *explicitly*
undefined behavior. The same is true of Java. There may, of course,
be undefined behavior as a result of overlooked points. For example,
it is not explicitly prescribed by ES 3.1 that evaluating arithmetic
expressions cannot have side effects.
--
Values of beeta will give rise to dom! John Cowan
(5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
to rename '.' or '..' entries; see cowan at ccil.org
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/odd.html)
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list