[r6rs-discuss] string->number

[Thomas Lord]

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:40 -0400, David Van Horn wrote:

> As made clear by the context of this note, the cited discussion
> of the editors, and the recent comments on this list by the editors,
> that note is applicable only when the string->number procedure may
> be applied to its arguments.
> 
> It is a simple typo -- a quantifier has been omitted.  An erratum is
> deserved.  I hope the editors fix the problem and move on.


Are there any procedural rules in place that
define some specific date or event after which
the text of R6 is fixed?

Suppose I want to print up and bind a copy
for my library, for example.

-t