[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4F: more symmetry
David Van Horn
dvanhorn at ccs.neu.edu
Thu Nov 5 15:15:05 EST 2009
John Cowan wrote:
> Quite true. In addition, it used to be true that vectors had O(1) access
> and lists O(N); now they both have O(N) access, but the constant factor
> is hugely larger for lists.
As far as I know, there have never been time bounds placed on list-ref
or vector-ref. So I don't understand the "it used to be true" comment.
Moreover, I don't understand why vectors would "now" have O(N) access
times (I assume you mean time and not space) based on what's in your
Thing One document.
David
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list