[r6rs-discuss] Implicitly Concurrent Scheme
cowan at ccil.org
Sun Nov 22 07:49:43 EST 2009
Antonio Vieiro scripsit:
> Aubrey has requested the restriction to be removed, so let's remove it.
> And if someone has something to say in *favour* of the restriction to be
> kept in the report then I'd like to see a serious reason for it to be
> kept (I haven't seen none yet).
> After all that's the spirit of Scheme: removing superfluous features and
> restrictions, isn't it?
No. The meaning of the celebrated paragraph, as I explained before, is to
remove restrictions on *programmers*. This is a restriction on programmers
whose purpose is to provide freedom to implementations.
After fixing the Y2K bug in an application: John Cowan
WELCOME TO <censored> cowan at ccil.org
DATE: MONDAK, JANUARK 1, 1900 http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
More information about the r6rs-discuss