[r6rs-discuss] Counter-proposal (Re: Proposed features for small Scheme, part 9: modules)

[Ray Dillinger]

On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 15:51 +0100, David Rush wrote:

> I am starting to suspect that the only truly correct way to move
> forward on macro modularity is to rebase the notion of a Scheme system
> as a purely interpreted textual language. Just throw the notion of
> static analysis out the door. Compilation then becomes a very
> aggressive partial evaluation of the program text.

> Others in the discussion have hinted at this...

+1. This interpretation would be a very happy thing for WG1 scheme.

				Bear