[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground

David Van Horn dvanhorn at ccs.neu.edu
Fri Sep 4 18:17:31 EDT 2009


John Cowan wrote:
> Do you think that R5RS unmodified would garner 90% as Small Scheme
> today?  I doubt it.

I doubt it as well.  I believe the IEEE standard would have the best 
chance; even that seems doubtful.

David



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list