[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground

Brian Harvey bh at cs.berkeley.edu
Fri Sep 4 23:55:36 EDT 2009


> Is continuation passing style is an acceptable substitute for multiple
> return values?

Are you asking me?  I'm not the one who feels the need for multiple return
values.  But if you mean, do I think it's okay to call a continuation with
more than one argument, of course -- Abelson and Sussman do it in the
nondeterministic evaluator.  :-)



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list