[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground
Brian Harvey
bh at cs.berkeley.edu
Fri Sep 4 23:55:36 EDT 2009
> Is continuation passing style is an acceptable substitute for multiple
> return values?
Are you asking me? I'm not the one who feels the need for multiple return
values. But if you mean, do I think it's okay to call a continuation with
more than one argument, of course -- Abelson and Sussman do it in the
nondeterministic evaluator. :-)
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list