[r6rs-discuss] Thoughts on Scheme's Future
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Sat Sep 5 02:59:05 EDT 2009
Anton van Straaten scripsit:
> Right. But the question is, should it be possible to implement all
> those things in Scheme, without having to resort to coding in some lower
> level or host language? If the answer is yes, then you still need
> something like first-class continuations. The same argument applies to
> (something like) threads.
Possible is one thing, sensible is another. It's possible to implement
blobs with ordinary general vectors, if you don't mind paying the price.
--
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Monday we watch-a Firefly's house, but he no come out. He wasn't home.
Tuesday we go to the ball game, but he fool us. He no show up. Wednesday he
go to the ball game, and we fool him. We no show up. Thursday was a
double-header. Nobody show up. Friday it rained all day. There was no ball
game, so we stayed home and we listened to it on-a the radio. --Chicolini
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list