[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground

[John Cowan]

David Rush scripsit:

> I'm sorry, but you're really, really wrong here. 

I already retracted this claim (though I keep the claim, until
shown otherwise, that R4-*only* implementations are not progressing).

-- 
Your worships will perhaps be thinking          John Cowan
that it is an easy thing to blow up a dog?      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
[Or] to write a book?
    --Don Quixote, Introduction                 cowan at ccil.org