[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground

[David Rush]

2009/9/4 David Van Horn <dvanhorn at ccs.neu.edu>:
> John Cowan wrote:
>> Do you think that R5RS unmodified would garner 90% as Small Scheme
>> today?  I doubt it.
>
> I doubt it as well.  I believe the IEEE standard would have the best
> chance; even that seems doubtful.

R4RS. Really. For the sake of a peaceful life, I might buy into R5RS
unmodified, but R4RS I could be happy about.

david rush
-- 
GPG Public key at http://cyber-rush.org/drr/gpg-public-key.txt