[r6rs-discuss] Modules

[Aaron W. Hsu]

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:21:59 -0400, Brian Mastenbrook  
<brian at mastenbrook.net> wrote:

> On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
>
>> My assertion is that mapping a module language to a specific system
>> behavior such as how the modules are laid out in the file system is a  
>> bad
>> idea.
>
>
> Where should this mapping be spelled out? Is it up to every  
> implementation to figure out, or can the mapping be nailed down for  
> implementations on a certain set of known platforms?

I think it would make sense to have a working group for standardizing  
behavior or locations or something like this, but it would be a standard  
that is optional. We could have this standard for POSIX, or some other  
platform, say.

	Aaron W. Hsu

-- 
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its  
victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis