[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground

Andre van Tonder andre at het.brown.edu
Tue Sep 15 17:08:23 EDT 2009


On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Per Bothner wrote:

> While a REPL is a very nice tool, it has its limitations;
> the classical REPL probably fits best very dynamic
> languages, with dynamic types, no user-defined classes,
> and a dynamic top-level environment.

Could someone remind me what language we
are discussing again in this list? ;-)

Andre



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list