[r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2 bis: I/O
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Sep 22 09:48:26 EDT 2009
Andrew Reilly scripsit:
> Why would thing-1 necessarily have to contain all of the workings for a scheme for
> embedded systems?
See the draft charter for WG1, which says:
# The purpose of working group 1 is to develop specifications, documents,
# and proofs of implementability for a "small" language in the Scheme
# family. This small language will encapsulate the fundamental features
# of Scheme. Its target uses include education, programming language
# research, small embedded systems, and embedded scripting languages,
# where it is appropriate to use a lightweight language at the semantic
# level and/or in the implementation.
If you don't like that (as it seems you don't), take it up with the
It was dreary and wearisome. Cold clammy winter still held way in this
forsaken country. The only green was the scum of livid weed on the dark
greasy surfaces of the sullen waters. Dead grasses and rotting reeds loomed
up in the mists like ragged shadows of long-forgotten summers.
--"The Passage of the Marshes" http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
More information about the r6rs-discuss