[r6rs-discuss] r7rs == scheme 7

John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
Wed Sep 30 13:28:55 EDT 2009


Jonathan Rees scripsit:

> If Sussman & Steele 1975 were Scheme 1, then the report after R6RS  
> would have to be Scheme 8.

If.  Personally, I call the 1975 report R0RS.  After all, we are computer
geeks, so we count from 0 anyhow.

-- 
John Cowan        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan          cowan at ccil.org
Please leave your values                Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.                      check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel                   --Cordelia Vorkosigan



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list