[r6rs-discuss] r7rs == scheme 7
cowan at ccil.org
Wed Sep 30 13:28:55 EDT 2009
Jonathan Rees scripsit:
> If Sussman & Steele 1975 were Scheme 1, then the report after R6RS
> would have to be Scheme 8.
If. Personally, I call the 1975 report R0RS. After all, we are computer
geeks, so we count from 0 anyhow.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Please leave your values Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel --Cordelia Vorkosigan
More information about the r6rs-discuss