Scheme at Bawden.Org
Mon Apr 9 01:38:13 EDT 2007
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:33:32 -0700
From: Thomas Lord <lord at emf.net>
I am proposing:
Again, I fully understand that this is a pretty out-of-left-field
set of suggestions. I presume (and regret) that if these
suggestions were simply adopted tomorrow it would be awkward for
editors and steering committee members alike, not least because it
would represent a decent amount of unplanned-for work. My bias
against the current draft, including what I've seen of the
effectiveness of the discussion list and the history of the
drafting, leads me to make these suggestions anyway.
Is that clearer, now?
I think so. But let me just check. I asked:
Alan Bawden wrote:
> I'm still unclear on what the idea is. But we're making
> progress. Please try again, but try to either (a) keep ammeding
> the charter out of it, or (b) make it clear that nothing short of
> ammeding the charter can address your concern.
So I think you've chosen option (b), correct?
More information about the Ratification-discuss